Read one, you want to read the next: The Oxford Book of English Detective Stories

    Patricia Craig, ed. The Oxford Book of English Detective Stories (1990) Craig has done wonderful job. A handful of the classics are here (e.g., “Silver Blaze”), and I’ve read work by many of the authors. But about half are new to me, and if the samples indicate their skill, they are underrated, for example Cyril Hare, whose “Miss Burnside’s Dilemma” shows how point of view can be used not only to narrate a crime but also to show its ripple effects.
     The collection covers about half a century, when detective stories concentrated on the puzzle, and the characters were just complicated enough to make both the crime and its discovery believable. What struck me was how little we need to be told of a character to construct an impression of the backstory that grounds motive in reality and method in plausibility. It was as often as not the style, the throw-away phrase or word, that created these impressions, I think because they create a vivid narrator. Make the story-teller sound trustworthy, and we will follow their lead.
     A potato-chip book: when you finish a story, you immediately want to read another. ***

Economics 201: Thermodynamics and efficiency

 Thermodynamics and economics: Why a car is the most expensive mode of transport.

A typical gasoline engine in a car runs at about 25% efficiency. That is, the energy in 1 out of every 4 litres (or gallons) of fuel in the tank does “useful work”. The energy is mostly converted to waste heat, but some is wasted in "internal losses", such friction in the engine and transmission, pumping coolant etc. (Efficiency in the lab can be much higher, but we’re talking real-world here, not lab conditions).

The “useful work” consists of moving the car. So about 1 of 4 litres of fuel is used to move the car and its driver. Let’s assume the car plus driver weighs a tonne (1000kg), of which the driver weighs 90kg. Since a litre is 1,000ml, the system burns 1ml of fuel per kg of weight. Of this, 90ml will be used to move the driver. The rest (910ml) is used to move the car. So out of a total of  4,000ml of fuel, 90 ml is used to move the driver. That’s approximately 1/4%.

Therefore: If the fuel costs $1/litre, you’ve spent $4 to move yourself, of which 1 cent's worth of fuel moves you, 99 cents’ worth moves the car, and $3 pays for internal losses and waste heat. One can scavenge some of that waste heat to warm the cabin in winter, so it’s not entirely wasted.

The above calculation ignores the effect of speed, because speed increases fuel consumption overall. However, since with increasing speed an increasing fraction of the energy is used to push air out of the way, the fraction used to move the driver decreases. In other words, at most 1/4% of the fuel moves the driver down the highway.

I’ve also ignored the effect of passengers, stuff in the trunk, etc, since those merely increase total weight and hence total fuel consumption. The amount of available useful work will still be about 25% of the energy in the fuel. The fractions for moving the car and moving the people in it will change somewhat: a loaded car will transport people and their gear a little more efficiently than a nearly empty one.

But however you tweak the scenario, using a car to transport people is appallingly wasteful.

The Sackett Brand: vengeance for murder.

     Louis L’Amour. The Sackett Brand (1965) One of the earlier Sackett stories: William Tell Sackett, a lonely man who has found Ange, his true love, is bushwhacked while scouting the trail for his wagon, tumbles down a cliff, and plunges into the river. Badly injured, but determined to get back to Ange, he finds her murdered. He eventually tracks down and kills her murderer. His quest causes rumours, so a bunch of Sacketts come to his aid. The story ends with his realisation that he will never be lonely again, with all those Sacketts surrounding him.
     A typical L’Amour romance, with a hero just this side of unbelievably tough. A good read for a fan of Westerns, a good introduction to L’Amour for those who haven’t discovered him yet. Average for L’Amour, above average for the genre. **½