13 May 2013

Ronald Lewin Hitler’s Mistakes (1984)


      Ronald Lewin Hitler’s Mistakes (1984) Lewin had a good reputation as a military historian, so it’s not surprising that this book focusses on Hitler’s mistakes as a “warlord”, which were many, all derived from a hubristic belief in his own military skills, compounded by his impatience with and contempt for the professional soldiers who could, if he had left them to fulfill their mission, have won the war for him.
     But the fundamental error was in his conception of the Thousand Year Empire. He conceived of imperial power as pure oppression. Despite his professed admiration for the Roman (and British) empires, and his claim that he had studied their histories, he did not grasp that these successful empires lasted for hundreds of years because they brought law and order, and hence a measure of peace, to the nations they controlled. True, they both suppressed anything that looked like organised opposition or rebellion, but they were more concerned with maintaining order and promoting trade than with establishing totalitarian rule. Both also afforded the subjugated people the advantages of citizenship, the Romans explicitly, the British implicitly by assimilation, especially of the conquered ruling classes.
     In contrast, Hitler’s vision was that of raw power, exercised by the Aryan colonists over the Untermenschen of the conquered lands. Lewin, following other people’s attempts at writing a psychological profile of Hitler, claims that Hitler’s character made it impossible for him to imagine any other form of empire. He was an egotistical, narcissistic psychopath, incapable of conceiving of anything beyond his self; but that self was empty at its core. The external trappings of power, even when he despised the toadies who flattered his ego, were all that sustained Hitler. He existed only as reflected by his environment; and so he had to build an environment that assured him that he was the most important object in the world, at its very centre, the hub that held together the wheel that turned and turned around him.
     The misconception of imperial power as oppression was one of the two primary socio-economic mistakes. The other was the eradication of the Jews, which from a purely practical point of view was stupid, for Hitler thereby eliminated a vast pool of labour and talent. It was conceptually stupid, too, because of course the Jews did not have the power and influence that Hitler ascribed to them. His belief in Jewish control in a way was a distorted reflection of his self-concept as the man of iron will, who made things happen merely by willing them. That it was a moral horror compounded the error, for it gave his enemies one more reason to attack him.
     Reading Lewin’s carefully laid out case for the errors that cost Hitler the war, one is left wondering how he could impose his will on a nation, and on a cadre of professional soldiers who obeyed him despite his obvious incompetence. How could such a stupid man get so many smart people to do what he wanted?
     One reason, in my opinion the main reason, was that he surrounded himself with thugs and psychopaths and then set them at odds with each other, thus ensuring that they would do whatever they thought he wanted merely in order to gain and hold power and the spoils of power. This method also prevented anyone from building a power base from which to claim the succession. But in preventing anything resembling a succession plan, Hitler also undermined his vision of a millennial empire. Even if he had won the war and established Nazi rule over Eastern Europe, the thugs and psychopaths would have engaged in ruinous internecine warfare as soon as Hitler died. The empire would have disintegrated almost immediately.
     Several times while reading this book, I was reminded of C. S. Lewis’s Screwtape Letters. The state of constant “competition” described by Screwtape as the natural order of things (in contrast to the Enemy’s maundering on about Love) is, I think, a perfect image of the world that Hitler created. It also explains why that world was doomed to end in abysmal failure. The tragedy is that while it lasted, it cost millions of lives; and destroying it cost millions of lives more.
     Lewin also mentions that Hitler was a coward. He visited a front only once. In 1944 he travelled to consult with the generals commanding the defence against the Allied advance in France. When an Allied bomber dropped a few bombs a couple kilometres from where Hitler and his generals were holed up, Hitler promptly turned around and went back to Berlin.
     A good book worth reading for the lessons it teaches. If you want to found an empire, do the opposite of what Hitler did, and you’ll likely succeed. A few too many typos mar an otherwise excellent text. ***

11 May 2013

Colin Dexter. The Riddle of the Third Mile (1983)

 

    Colin Dexter. The Riddle of the Third Mile (1983) A headless torso, academic hatreds, sleazy Soho massage parlours, and revenge for ancient slights fuel this investigation by Morse and Lewis. Well done as usual, although the puzzle creaks a bit. This book was one of the early TV episodes, and worked very well in that medium. Dexter’s sense of evil is almost as acute as Ruth Rendell’s. **½ (2004)

W. J. Burley. Wycliffe and the Redhead (1997)

     W. J. Burley. Wycliffe and the Redhead (1997) An old murder causes trouble, as the daughter of the convicted man takes a job with the man whose evidence put her father away. Her body is found in a quarry, and Wycliffe’s investigation reveals more secrets, etc, until the true perp is unmasked. Well crafted, but forgettable (I’m writing this some three weeks after I read the book, and I can’t remember much, even with the help of the cover blurb.) I’m finding other Wycliffe books and reading them, but I probably won’t keep them. the TV series based on these books was/is above average. This often happens with merely good genre fiction. ** (2004)

Andre Norton. Uncharted Stars (1969)

     Andre Norton. Uncharted Stars (1969) A picaresque adventure story, in which shape shifting, hyperspace, mind-reading, narrow escapes, etc, figure prominently. A swords’n’scorcerers fantasy transposed into a technological universe, in other words. Murdoc Jern continues his quest for the zero stones with the help of Eet, a mutant pussy cat who teaches Murdoc to use what little ESP powers he possesses. The ending promises further adventures, as Eet is transformed into a human-type female of spectacular beauty. I don’t know if Norton produced more stories in this series; but as the characters don’t drive the plot, I don’t feel any real loss if she didn’t. The cover blurbs praise the book rather extravagantly. ** (2004)

M. C. Beaton. Agatha Raisin and the Love from Hell (2001)

     M. C. Beaton. Agatha Raisin and the Love from Hell (2001) Agatha and James have married (I missed the book(s) in which this happened), but they are not as compatible as they thought they might be. James takes up with a local hoyden, is attacked by person(s) unknown, and disappears. A few days later, the hoyden turns up very dead, and both James and Agatha are the obvious suspects. The tale focuses on Agatha’s attempts to clear her name by finding the murderer, with the help of Sir Charles Fraith. They succeed of course, but not without the usual near-death experience that Agatha suffers in every case. James and Agatha agree to a divorce, so we will see her as a single middle-aged woman in future. I suspect these aspects of the story relate to M C Beaton’s own life, but whether as reflections or variations is impossible to tell. Better plotted than others, somewhat more characterisation, too, but still basically fluff. ** (2004)

M. C. Beaton. Agatha Raisin and the Murderous Marriage (1996)

     M. C. Beaton. Agatha Raisin and the Murderous Marriage (1996) Agatha’s wedding to James is stopped when her long-lost drunkard husband Jimmy shows up. A day later Jimmy turns up dead in a ditch, strangled by a man, or so it seems. Wanting to clear themselves of the obvious suspicions, Agatha and James investigate, and turn up a tangled history of blackmail. Further murders complicate the case, but in the end justice triumphs, while true love languishes. Agreeable but not memorable fluff. Beaton can write better (she did in the first couple of books in this series.) *½ (2004)

M. C. Beaton Agatha Raisin and the Vicious Vet (1993)

     M. C. Beaton Agatha Raisin and the Vicious Vet (1993) This time, a new vet with googly eyes and a smooth manner disturbs the ladies of Carsely, until he is murdered. Agatha finds out that he has conned loadsadough out of his smitten victims, and of course has made enough enemies that the field of suspects is satisfyingly large, his partner among them. Both lust and money figure in the motives. Plotting is creaky, style is slapdash and superficial; Beaton is simply churning out this series. Agatha’s continuing romance with her neighbour and sleuthing partner James Lacey is tied into the plot, but isn’t really necessary. *½ (2004)

Dick Whittington - What Really Happened (Sitwell, 1945)

 Osbert Sitwell. The True Story of Dick Whittington (1946) My great-aunt Dolly gave me this book in 1949. I wonder whether she read it firs...