Tuesday, April 02, 2013

Richard Buckle. Debrett’s U and Non-U Revisited (1978)

     Richard Buckle. Debrett’s U and Non-U Revisited (1978) Continues the discussion started by Nancy Mitford in her Noblesse Oblige. Mitford intended her book as a gentle satire on English class distinctions in the first half of the twentieth century. Buckle seems to take the whole thing seriously, which makes for a lot of unintended humour. There are a few useful nuggets, though: a reminder that in most countries of Europe titles of nobility are regulated by law, for example, and the distinction between the aristocracy and the peerage may have value for writers of historical and romantic fiction, or detective stories set in England. There exists an aristocracy in Canada and the USA as well, of course, and they are as jealous of their class privileges and rights as any anywhere. And like all aristocracies, they use linguistic and other markers to enforce them. Language, manners, and fashion's primary purpose is to mark the boundaries between Us and Them. *½ (2003)

No comments:

Scams (Lapham's Quarterly 8-02, Swindle & Fraud)

Lapham’s Quarterly 8-02: Swindle & Fraud (2015). An entertaining read, and for that reason possibly a misleading one. It’s fun to read a...