Sunday, August 05, 2012

Van Gogh Up Close (Art Review)


Van Gogh Up Close (National Art Gallery, 30th August 2012)
     The show did not live up to its hype, but what show ever does? It depicts Van Gogh's time in France, when he was working towards his final artistic vision. Seeing early, mid and (too few) late pieces from this time was interesting in an art-historical way, but few of the pictures moved me. Most of them looked like what they were: experiments. Van Gogh was a very self-conscious artist, who spent his life trying to find out where he wanted to go and how to get there. It took him a long time to develop his visual language. Oddly enough (or maybe not), the earlier paintings I liked were the ones that reminded me of Klimt (eg Trees and Undergrowth 1887and Monet (eg Undergrowth 1887, Rain 1889). These were all landscapes, most showed forests. The intermediate ones, in which he mostly experimented with Japanese composition and close-up subjects, showed that he was moving towards the astonishing last paintings in composition and content, but he was still trying to minimise the brushwork. A couple of the later paintings, in which he laid on the paint thick and largely unmixed, were worth a second or third look (eg Wheatfield behind St Paul Hospital 1889). The ones I wanted to see, all from his last few months of life, were not available.
     Most pictures looked faded and wan. Reproductions on postcards and posters are generally brighter and more intense. Perhaps a combination of new paint technology and cheap paint (Van Gogh often couldn’t afford the expensive ones) is the cause. It’s known for sure that some of his sunflower paintings turned brown because of a chemical reaction in the white paint that he’d added to the yellow. Or more likely I’ve come to expect originals to be even more brilliant than reproductions. Whatever, I was disappointed in the look of the show. The room of Japanese woodcuts, shown to illuminate Van Gogh’s composition experiments, was a delight. Looking at them, it occurred to me how much these pictures, with their unusual points of view, contrasts between foreground detail and mid- and background subjects, stylised drawing and colouring, resemble comic book art.
   Rating for the show: **½
   Updated 2012-08-06

No comments:

Scams (Lapham's Quarterly 8-02, Swindle & Fraud)

Lapham’s Quarterly 8-02: Swindle & Fraud (2015). An entertaining read, and for that reason possibly a misleading one. It’s fun to read a...