Photo of an iris

An iris from a few years ago. We are looking forward to this year's blooms.

Small defeats: Govier's short stories

     Katherine Govier. The Immaculate Conception Photography Gallery (1994) The title story tells how professional photographer Sandro slides into doctoring photos, and eventually repents after a period of adding or removing people from group photos. A small defeat, but characteristic of the fates of Govier’s characters. It seems to me to be a Canadian characteristic, for Munro, Atwood, Garner, Mitchell etc all tell similar stories. Yet these defeats as often as not strengthen the characters. They have found their proper place in the scheme of things, and accepting that is a kind of victory.
     I enjoyed reading the book, but not enough to read it without interruptions. Worth a look if you find a copy. The title refers to Sandro’s shop, which he has named after the nearby church. **½

Econ 101: Why wage subsidies won’t bankrupt the country

A comment in response to the Financial Post’s worry about how much the wage subsidy program will cost. It was announced by Prime Minister Trudeau on 2020 03 30.

Since this is a wage subsidy program, most of the money will be used to pay for shelter, utilities, food, and transportation. Most of these dollars will generate sales tax revenue for  the Province (8% in Ontario) and/or the Federal government (5%) when spent.

But a dollar spent will be spent again. The consensus is that a dollar will be spent between five and seven times before all or part of it returns to the original spender. That means about 65 to 70% of the money will return to the governments.

In short, the wage subsidy will largely pay for itself. The question, “How much will the program cost?” misses the point.

Footnote: The Canadian government will provide wage subsidies of 75% on the first $59,400 of a person's wages. This will be available to all employers whose business has been impacted by covid-19. The Prime Minister also urged businesses to pay the additional 25%, and warned that any business trying to game the system will be dealt with. Many workers will eventually pay income tax on all or part of the wage subsidy.

Update 2020 03 31: My arithmetic is off, since food isn't taxed. So I estimate the payback in taxes at about 40 to 70%. However I haven't factored in the payback, financial and otherwise, of keeping the suppliers of food and transportation etc in business.

Nostalgia and history: Cartoons by Lancaster

Osbert Lancaster. The Penguin Osbert Lancaster. (1964) Lancaster was for many years an editorial cartoonist for the Daily Express. He had other sources of income, too. His charmingly accurate stereotypes of the upper middle and upper classes shows that he belonged to that social stratum.
     The cartoons are of course dated in their references to then current political and social issues, but his commentary is not. Rather more damage is done by foolishness, incompetence, and an uninformed desire to do good than by active malice. Thus, in a 1949 cartoon, one newspaper reader to another, “I may be underestimating slightly, but by my reckoning this makes the seventeenth ‘most important mission in history’ since 1945.”
     There’s also a section on the development of interior decorating, acutely observed. All in all, a nicely done dose of nostalgia and history. ****

"20th century functional" architecture, as seen by Lancaster. He was an expert historian of architectural fashion.

 

Econ 101: Supply chain fragility (another example of neo-liberal economic failure)

A letter I sent to the Atlantic Magazine a few minutes ago

Re: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/supply-chains-and-coronavirus/608329/

Lizzy O'Leary's piece is a welcome reminder of reality. But it doesn't go far enough. The cure is not to "diversify the supply chain", as implied towards the of her article. It's to change the mindset that maximizing profits is the aim of a business, or worse, that it's the aim of the economy.

It is that mindset that has pared down resilience. A resilient system has redundancies. Redundancies cost money. Removing them reduces the costs, and hence maximizes profits.

Business profitability is one, and only one, of the many numbers that describe the state of an economy. Believing that it is the purpose of the system to maximize that one number is obviously crazy. One might as well say that it is the purpose of eating to maximize the throughput of the digestive system.

Businesses exist to provide what we need and what we want. That is their social, and therefore their economic role. "Profit" is a signal that the business is fulfilling that role. That's all it is.

It's time to rescue the economy from the advice of economists who have a superstitious reverence for profitability.

Maigret takes the waters

     Georges Simenon. Maigret in Vichy (1968) Told by his friend and doctor to take the waters at Vichy, Maigret is enjoying a relaxed daily routine with his wife. On their regular walks, they see “the lady in lilac”, whose self-possession attracts Maigret’s attention. A few days on, she is murdered.
     The local inspector is a former colleague and protege of Maigret’s, so of course the great man is drawn into the investigation. It proceeds to its inevitable end through a series of interviews. That’s Simenon’s schtick: dialogue feels more immediate than narration, so we keep reading to find out where the new information will lead. As novels, these books are light weight, the characters are realised just enough to carry the story forward. As entertainments, they are first class. Simenon knows how to set the hook.
    

I enjoyed reading this confection, but it didn’t persuade me. We’ve watched a few episodes of Maigret played by Rowan Atkinson, which I find much more persuasive. Why is it that second rate books so often make first rate television? **½

Michael Richards didn't rant about being white

From an email exchange.

I was sent an email that included a rant supposedly by Michael Richards.
This was my response:

Oh dear, what a whinge!

And Michael Richards did not make these points, in court or anywhere else. See https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/proud-to-be-white/ (1)

The reason there are "just Americans" is because white is the default standard. That's not in itself racist, but it does prompt racist logic, such as "My country is being taken away from me...".

Just as "male" is the default standard for "human", which among other things has caused subtle and not so subtle errors in diagnosis, medication trials, biological science, etc. E.g, it has  endangered/killed many women who were having heart attacks, because women typically don't have the same heart attack symptoms as men.

Just as college students have been the default "subjects" for psych and sociology studies simply because they were handy. But they are different from most people. For one thing, their brains are still immature.

Just as Western thinking/culture is the default standard for logic and common sense. Which is why Westerners are astonished when people elsewhere in the world think differently.

Actually, there are (still) Polish-Americans, German-Americans, Italian-Americans, etc. Just not English-Americans. White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (aka WASP) is the default standard for "just Americans".

Etc.

(1) Misrepresenting sources is a common extremist tactic. It's just one example of the extremist belief that any wrong-doing is justified if it's done "for the cause", whatever the cause may be. For example, it's how the Inquisition justified the torture and burning of "heretics". That included some of my Protestant ancestors. Of course, other ancestors happily justified murdering Catholics using the same logic.

Have a good day,

Update 2020-11-14: There's more than one Michael Richards the stand-up comic did make a racist rant. The Guardian carried a story about how it wrecked his career.